Killer Arguments Against Citizen's Income, Not (12)
In a paper published on Academia.edu
Frederick Harry Pitts, Lorena Lombardozzi and Neil Warner warn that:
Basic income may not be the ideal response to automation and technological unemployment envisaged by its proponents. In fact, it risks embalming our current economy defined by low-skilled, low-paid, and unrewarding work for longer than would otherwise be the case
They support this claim by asserting that the Speenhamland System was a type of basic income and then point out how the system failed.
However, from Wiki: The authorities at Speenhamland approved ...