Biden hands Howard Stern live interview as NY Times melts down over apparent brush-off

26.04.2024 20:24

Raw Story

President Joe Biden gave a nearly-unannounced, last-minute, live exclusive interview Friday morning to Howard Stern, the SiriusXM radio host who for decades, from the mid-1990s to about 2015, was a top Trump friend, fan and aficionado.

But the impetus behind the president's move appears to be a rare and unsigned statement from The New York Times Company, defending the "paper of record" after months of anger from the public over what some say is biased negative coverage of the Biden presidency and, especially, a Thursday report by Politico claiming Times Publisher A.G. Sulzberger is furious the president has refused to give the "Grey Lady" an in-person interview.

"The Times’ desire for a sit-down interview with Biden by the newspaper’s White House team is no secret around the West Wing or within the D.C. bureau," Politico reported.

"Getting the president on the record with the paper of record is a top priority for publisher A.G. Sulzberger. So much so that last May, when Vice President Kamala Harris arrived at the newspaper’s Midtown headquarters for an off-the-record meeting with around 40 Times journalists, Sulzberger devoted several minutes to asking her why Biden was still refusing to grant the paper — or any major newspaper — an interview."

"In Sulzberger’s view," Politico explained, "only an interview with a paper like the Times can verify that the 81-year-old Biden is still fit to hold the presidency."

But it was this statement that made Politico's scoop go viral.

“'All these Biden people think that the problem is Peter Baker or whatever reporter they’re mad at that day,' one Times journalist said. 'It’s A.G. He’s the one who is pi--ed [that] Biden hasn’t done any interviews and quietly encourages all the tough reporting on his age.'"

Popular Information founder Judd Legum in March documented The New York Times' (and other top papers') obsession with Biden's age after the Hur Report.

Thursday evening the Times put out a "scorching" statement, as Politico later reported, not on the newspaper's website but on the company's corporate website, not addressing the Politico piece directly but calling it “troubling” that Biden “has so actively and effectively avoided questions from independent journalists during his term.”

Media watchers and critics pushed back on the Times' statement.

"NYT issues an unprecedented statement slamming Biden for 'actively and effectively avoid[ing] questions from independent journalists during his term' and claiming it's their 'independence' that Biden dislikes, when it's actually that they're dying to trip him up," wrote media critic Dan Froomkin, editor of Press Watch.

Froomkin also pointed to a 2017 report from Poynter, a top journalism site published by The Poynter Institute, that pointed out the poor job the Times did of interviewing then-President Trump.

Others, including former Biden Deputy Secretary of State Brian McKeon, debunked the Times' claim Biden hasn't given interviews to independent journalists by pointing to Biden's interviews with CBS News' "60 Minutes" and a 20-minute sit-down interview with veteran journalist John Harwood for ProPublica.

Former Chicago Sun-Times editor Mark Jacob, now a media critic who publishes Stop the Presses, offered a more colorful take of Biden's decision to go on Howard Stern.

The Times itself just last month reported on a "wide-ranging interview" Biden gave to The New Yorker.

Watch the video and read the social media posts above or at this link.